Skip Navigation


French History Advance Access originally published online on November 20, 2008
French History 2009 23(1):47-68; doi:10.1093/fh/crn047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/47    most recent
crn047v2
crn047v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Germani, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Study of French History. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Military justice under the Directory: the Armies of Italy and of the Sambre and Meuse

Ian Germani*

* The author is Associate Professor in the Department of History at the University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. He may be contacted at ian.germani{at}uregina.ca


   Abstract

The military justice records of the Armies of Italy and the Sambre and Meuse reveal that, despite their contrasting military fortunes during the campaigns of 1796–97, their experiences were very similar in many respects. The records of the conseils militaires of the year IV (1795–96) and the conseils de guerre of the following year reveal both conditions of service in the two armies and the circumstances and attitudes that regulated the relationship between soldiers and civilians in Italy and Germany. The conseils de guerre, instituted to remedy the perceived laxity of the conseils militaires, operated on similar principles to their much-maligned predecessors. Occasional instances of exemplary severity apart, these conseils frequently mitigated both charges and sentences, reserving the full severity of the law for soldiers who were not present to receive punishment. The councils protected miscreant soldiers more effectively than they did vulnerable civilians, but they nonetheless affirmed, if only in principle, the idea that revolutionary warfare should be contained within legal limits.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.