Skip Navigation


French History Advance Access originally published online on February 6, 2009
French History 2009 23(1):22-46; doi:10.1093/fh/crn064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/22    most recent
crn064v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clay, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Study of French History. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Vengeance, justice and the reactions in the Revolutionary Midi

Stephen Clay*

* The author is a maître de conférences at Sciences Po, Paris. He may be contacted at sclay{at}club-internet.fr


   Abstract

This article explores the nature of political conflict, violence and justice in the Midi provençal during the French Revolution. It emphasizes the continuity of conflict between rival factions dividing most communes in the region throughout the Revolutionary decade, conflict that frequently issued in individual and collective violence, most notoriously the prison massacres of the White Terror (or the Reaction, as it was known among contemporaries) at Aix, Tarascon and Marseille in the spring of 1795. These massacres, among the most spectacular expressions of collective vengeance and popular justice in the Revolution, presented the nascent judicial system of the Revolution with some of its greatest challenges in the pursuit and punishment of these crimes, not least because of the political partiality of the judicial authorities. This article further illustrates how the phenomenon of multiple Reactions between warring factions, representing fundamental socio-economic differences and competing visions of the Republic, provides an understanding of the whole Revolutionary process in the region.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.