Skip Navigation


French History Advance Access originally published online on October 20, 2008
French History 2008 22(4):446-468; doi:10.1093/fh/crn045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/446    most recent
crn045v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frederking, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Study of French History. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

‘Il ne faut pas être le roi de deux peuples’: strategies of national reconciliation in Restoration France

Bettina Frederking*

* The author is a doctoral student at the Université de Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris. She may be contacted at frederki{at}club-internet.fr


   Abstract

On 4 June 1814, Louis XVIII, recently restored to the throne of France, promulgated the Constitutional Charter, a royal gift (‘octroi’) ratifying the major achievements of the French Revolution. The monarchy had to resolve a crucial problem: how, after the divisions of the revolutionary and imperial years, could the reconciliation of the ‘deux France’ be realized so as to create a stable foundation for the regime? This article analyses different strategies for national reconciliation in the light of the crisis of legitimacy and representation faced by the restored monarchy: not only amnesty, oubli (forgetting), pardon, commemoration and its religious version, expiation, but also the punishment of coupables (culprits) and attempts at integration. It will also examine the reactions provoked by these contradictory, often mutually exclusive strategies, as well as evaluating their success and their contribution to either strengthening or weakening the restored monarchy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.