Skip Navigation


French History Advance Access originally published online on September 3, 2007
French History 2007 21(3):331-352; doi:10.1093/fh/crm015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/331    most recent
crm015v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cubitt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Study of French History. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Martyrs of charity, heroes of solidarity: Catholic and republican responses to the fire at the Bazar de la Charité, Paris, 1897

Geoffrey Cubitt*

* The author is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of History, University of York. He may be contacted at gtc2{at}york.ac.uk


   Abstract

The fire that devastated Paris' Bazar de la Charité on 4 May 1897, claiming around 130 lives, occurred at a moment of tension-ridden ambiguity in relations between the Catholic Church and the French Republican state—a moment traversed by initiatives of Ralliement and by the resistance that those initiatives encountered in both the Catholic and the Republican camp. The article shows how these tensions were reflected and worked out in the interpretations of the fire that were publicly offered by Catholic and Republican spokesmen. Focusing on the rhetoric and imagery of these interpretations, it shows how terms like ‘solidarity’, ‘charity’ and ‘sacrifice’ were employed in a range of senses and of rhetorical contexts, serving sometimes as vehicles of negotiation between Catholic and Republican sensibilities, sometimes as markers of intransigent positions. Discourse on the fire, both Catholic and Republican, found a potent focus in contrasting images of a heroism structured by class and gender, highlighting on the one hand the solidaristic spirit of heroic working class males and on the other the sacrificial martyrdom of upper class women.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.