Skip Navigation


French History Advance Access originally published online on June 4, 2007
French History 2007 21(2):187-204; doi:10.1093/fh/crm001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/2/187    most recent
crm001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Study of French History. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The royal confessor and his rivals in seventeenth-century France

Joseph Bergin*

* The author is Professor of History at the University of Manchester and Fellow of the British Academy. He may be contacted at joe.bergin{at}man.ac.uk


  Abstract

The most memorable portraits of the French royal confessors of any period are in Saint-Simon's memoirs, and his judgements of them have survived relatively unscathed compared to those he delivered on Louis XIV's ministers generally. His account assumes that royal confessors normally wielded huge influence, but in fact the situation that he describes applies only to Louis XIV's confessors. This essay attempts to put the rise of the confessor into its historical context from Henri IV's reign onwards, primarily by attempting to analyse the rivals and alternatives to the confessor—grand almoners, archbishops of Paris, cardinal ministers. The solutions that emerged under Louis XIV were in no way inevitable, which may explain why they did not survive him. The longevity of his confessors in office contrasts sharply with the fragility of earlier generations of confessors and reflects the shifts in the roles they played within court and ecclesiastical politics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.