Skip Navigation


French History Advance Access originally published online on April 26, 2006
French History 2006 20(3):333-351; doi:10.1093/fh/crl002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/333    most recent
crl002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Study of French History. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Six Fevrier 1934 and the ‘Survival’ of the French Republic

Brian Jenkins*

* Brian Jenkins is Senior Research Fellow in the Department of French at the University of Leeds. Email: b.j.jenkins{at}leeds.ac.uk

The Paris riots of the six février 1934 are remembered chiefly as the event that provided the initial spark and the eventual rationale for the anti-fascist Popular Front. However, most French historians have tended to downplay the importance of the riots themselves, arguing that the Republic was not under serious threat, and that the Left at the time greatly exaggerated the danger. Indeed, the fact that the regime ‘survived’ these events has often been cited as proof of its resilience, of France’s deep-rooted ‘democratic political culture’, and its inbuilt ‘immunity’ to fascism. This historiographical review argues that the standard interpretation of the six février is deeply flawed, especially in its tendency to deduce the intentions of the actors from the outcome of the events. The six février constituted a serious challenge to the regime, and created a dangerously fluid situation in which a variety of ‘outcomes’ became possible. It should be analysed not as a discrete and temporally circumscribed event but as a key moment in an ongoing process of political radicalization on the French Right.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.